TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a01287562ae89970c0168e604a3e2970c
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference 360:
You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.
This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.
It is interesting, .. because it is a photo, you don't see that at first glance. But is it still interesting when you cut out the forms in colored paper? It is then still a nice composition, but also a bit boring, seen that hundreds of times in magazines lay-outs and book covers and so on. But you can say also that my thoughts of this composition and photo are totally irrelevant ..
Posted by: Frank | January 26, 2012 at 02:52 PM
Frank,
I think you make an interesting point here, involving the semantic ground of photography itself. An interesting photograph of two buildings which look like a boring cut-out in colored paper which looks like an interesting photograph of two buildings which looks like a boring cut-out in colored paper which looks like...
Posted by: Gianni Galassi | January 26, 2012 at 09:21 PM